Thai vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Thai
Slavic
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Thais
Slavs
10.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,466,782 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,820,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 29.1%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Slavic |
Minimum | 1.4% | 8.9% |
Maximum | 20.1% | 87.0% |
Range | 18.6% | 78.1% |
Mean | 7.6% | 21.3% |
Median | 7.1% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Thais by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Filipino (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from India (9.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Costa Rican (13.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (13.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Lebanese (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Colombians | 77.2 /100 | #145 | Good 13.2% |
South Americans | 76.9 /100 | #146 | Good 13.2% |
Europeans | 76.8 /100 | #147 | Good 13.2% |
Lebanese | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 13.2% |
Sierra Leoneans | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 13.2% |
Iraqis | 76.0 /100 | #150 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 75.8 /100 | #151 | Good 13.2% |
Slavs | 75.7 /100 | #152 | Good 13.2% |
Northern Europeans | 73.7 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Arabs | 73.5 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 72.9 /100 | #155 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 72.0 /100 | #156 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 70.3 /100 | #157 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 69.2 /100 | #158 | Good 13.3% |
Uruguayans | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |