Thai vs Latvian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Thai
Latvian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Thais
Latvians
11.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Latvian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,747,555 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.513 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,902,894 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 13.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Thai | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 21.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.0% | 98.9% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 18.4% |
| Median | 6.4% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Latvians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 5.8%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Indian (Asian) (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Maltese (13.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Okinawan (13.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.0%, a difference of 0.95%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |