Sri Lankan vs Brazilian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Brazilian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Brazilians
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Brazilian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,980,227 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,645,938 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 43.1% | 32.6% |
| Range | 40.5% | 30.4% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 10.3% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Brazilians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |