Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Latvia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Latvia
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Latvia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,502 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,952,917 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 19.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 3.3% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 55.9% |
Range | 96.7% | 50.1% |
Mean | 20.7% | 19.7% |
Median | 18.1% | 17.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.9% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latvia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Zimbabwean (19.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (19.4%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (19.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belarus (19.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (19.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Peruvian (19.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |