Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Central America Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,442,527 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 524,281,293 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 3.5%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Soviet Union	Immigrants from Central America
Minimum	1.0%	10.2%
Maximum	56.5%	76.9%
Range	55.5%	66.7%
Mean	13.5%	21.1%
Median	10.5%	17.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	13.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.7%	22.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.9%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.8%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.7%	12.5%

Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Central America by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from El Salvador (14.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bahamas (14.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Senegalese (14.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from South America (14.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Mexican (14.4%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Mexico (14.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Cheyenne (14.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Guatemala (15.1%, a difference of 0.59%), Guatemalan (14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Jamaican (15.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #271	Tragic 14.4%
Mexicans	0.0 /100 \| #272	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| South America	0.0 /100 \| #273	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 14.5%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 14.5%
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 14.5%
Immigrants \| Colombia	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 14.6%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 14.6%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 14.7%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 14.8%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 14.8%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 14.8%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 14.9%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 14.9%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 15.0%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 15.1%
Jamaicans	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 15.1%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 15.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 15.2%
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 15.2%