Slavic vs Immigrants from Belize Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,076,225 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,541,689 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.80%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Slavic	Immigrants from Belize
Minimum	2.0%	0.55%
Maximum	100.0%	62.1%
Range	98.0%	61.5%
Mean	29.6%	19.4%
Median	21.0%	17.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.9%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.1%	22.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	23.2%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	22.4%	10.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.0%	10.4%

Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Belize by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Austria (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Pakistani (19.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%
French Canadians	73.0 /100 \| #162	Good 19.9%