Panamanian vs Immigrants from Belize Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,422,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,541,689 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.81%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Panamanian	Immigrants from Belize
Minimum	5.0%	0.55%
Maximum	75.3%	62.1%
Range	70.3%	61.5%
Mean	21.6%	19.4%
Median	19.2%	17.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.7%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.4%	22.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.1%	10.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.9%	10.4%

Demographics Similar to Panamanians and Immigrants from Belize by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Slavic (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Pennsylvania German (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Pakistani (19.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belgium (19.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%
Pakistanis	74.1 /100 \| #160	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	74.1 /100 \| #161	Good 19.8%