Scottish vs Czech Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Scottish
Czech
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Comparison
Scottish
Czechs
20.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 18-24 YEAR OLDS
22.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Czech Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,782,513 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,095,157 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | Czech |
Minimum | 6.3% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.7% | 96.6% |
Mean | 49.0% | 33.8% |
Median | 30.9% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.4% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.8% | 38.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 61.4% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.8% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.5% | 24.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Singapore (20.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guatemala (20.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (20.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eritrea (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Okinawan (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Whites/Caucasians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 6.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 20.8% |
Finns | 6.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 5.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 20.8% |
Welsh | 5.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 5.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 20.8% |
Okinawans | 4.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 20.8% |
Scottish | 4.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 20.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 20.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 20.9% |
Luxembourgers | 4.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 20.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 4.2 /100 | #241 | Tragic 20.9% |
Israelis | 4.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 20.9% |
Marshallese | 3.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 20.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.4 /100 | #244 | Tragic 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Latvia (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican American Indian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (20.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Spain (20.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Germany | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 20.3% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 29.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 20.3% |
Moroccans | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 24.4 /100 | #192 | Fair 20.4% |
Nigerians | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 20.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 23.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 20.4% |
Czechs | 22.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 20.4% |
Zimbabweans | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 20.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 20.7 /100 | #198 | Fair 20.4% |
Germans | 20.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 20.4% |
Europeans | 19.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 20.4% |
Mexicans | 18.3 /100 | #201 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 20.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 20.5% |