Polish vs Immigrants from Indonesia Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,182,984 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,005,757 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.756 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 1.7%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Polish	Immigrants from Indonesia
Minimum	2.9%	0.40%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	97.1%	99.6%
Mean	20.7%	16.7%
Median	13.7%	12.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.0%	9.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.7%	15.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.7%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.9%	17.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	20.8%	17.7%

Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Indonesia by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Estonian (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 14.3%
Zimbabweans	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 14.3%
Poles	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Israel	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%