Pakistani vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Pakistani
Sri Lankan
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Pakistanis
Sri Lankans
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,364,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,349,491 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 0.73%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pakistani | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 4.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 33.1% |
Range | 95.7% | 31.4% |
Mean | 22.3% | 15.7% |
Median | 15.8% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Sri Lankans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scottish (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (14.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Irish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Carpatho Rusyn (14.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |