Laotian vs Italian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Laotian
Italian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Laotians
Italians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Italian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,849,875 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 561,533,046 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 3.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Italian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 78.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 77.9% | 98.7% |
Mean | 17.1% | 16.5% |
Median | 13.8% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 14.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Italians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are European (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Romania (14.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Europe (14.2%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Korean (13.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (13.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Greece (13.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Polish (14.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Zimbabweans | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Laotians | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.3% |