Indian (Asian) vs Croatian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Croatian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Croatians
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Croatian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,865,667 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 374,551,597 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 0.40%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 22.2% | 59.0% |
| Range | 21.0% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 15.2% |
| Median | 7.7% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Croatians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Australian (9.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (9.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belgium (9.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Denmark (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Denmark (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Belgium (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from China (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Australian (9.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Russian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Australians | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Russians | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Asians | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Swiss | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.7% |