Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Jordanian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 389,452,737 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,137,509 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 2.3%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Southern Europe	Jordanian
Minimum	2.5%	3.1%
Maximum	26.1%	33.3%
Range	23.6%	30.2%
Mean	15.4%	17.9%
Median	15.8%	18.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.2%	14.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.7%	21.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.5%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.5%	6.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	6.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe and Jordanians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Asian (18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Sri Lankan (18.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Bhutanese (18.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Samoan (18.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Scotland (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Belarus (18.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Greek (18.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Albania (18.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.2%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 18.2%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 18.3%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 18.4%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 18.4%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 18.4%
Egyptians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 18.5%
Greeks	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 18.6%
Jordanians	99.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 18.6%