Immigrants from Poland vs Laotian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,862,238 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,849,875 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 0.18%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Poland	Laotian
Minimum	2.0%	0.17%
Maximum	39.0%	78.1%
Range	37.1%	77.9%
Mean	12.5%	17.1%
Median	11.8%	13.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.4%	10.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.5%	19.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	13.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Laotians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Netherlands (14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.22%), European (14.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), European (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Scandinavians	98.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.2%
Zimbabweans	98.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Romania	98.3 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.2 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.3%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.3%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.3%
Laotians	98.0 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.0 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	97.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Poland	97.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.3%
Cambodians	97.8 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.6 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.4%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.4%
Ukrainians	97.5 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	97.5 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.4%
Australians	97.5 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.3 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.5%
Swiss	97.3 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 14.5%