Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from China
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Immigrants from China
26.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.1%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,012,343 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 26.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,985,494 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 26.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 51.6% | 53.5% |
| Range | 46.9% | 41.0% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 24.9% |
| Median | 24.6% | 23.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.4% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from China by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Okinawan (26.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Fiji (26.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Maltese (26.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (26.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Bulgarian (26.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (26.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (26.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (26.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Burmese (26.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 26.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 26.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 26.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 26.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 26.6% |