Immigrants from Dominican Republic vs Tlingit-Haida Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,456,906 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 21.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,396,606 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 22.0%, a difference of 0.40%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Dominican Republic	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	7.2%	1.3%
Maximum	43.1%	72.7%
Range	35.8%	71.4%
Mean	23.4%	23.2%
Median	22.5%	21.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	18.4%	15.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	26.8%	28.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.4%	13.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	14.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.4%	13.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic and Tlingit-Haida by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Dominican Republic are Immigrants from Dominica (21.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (21.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (21.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Yaqui (21.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Subsaharan African (22.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Subsaharan African (22.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (22.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Bermudan (21.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Ugandan (22.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.1%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Basques	0.2 /100 \| #272	Tragic 21.7%
New Zealanders	0.2 /100 \| #273	Tragic 21.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 21.8%
Bahamians	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 21.8%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 21.9%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #279	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.1 /100 \| #280	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.1 /100 \| #281	Tragic 21.9%
Bermudans	0.1 /100 \| #282	Tragic 21.9%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 22.0%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 22.0%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 22.0%
Ugandans	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 22.1%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 22.1%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 22.3%
French American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 22.3%
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 22.4%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 22.5%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 22.5%