Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Creek Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,223,465 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,296,748 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia	Creek
Minimum	1.9%	4.3%
Maximum	55.6%	40.0%
Range	53.6%	35.7%
Mean	14.3%	14.5%
Median	10.6%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.6%	9.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.7%	17.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.2%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.6%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.5%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Bolivia (11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Burmese (11.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Turkish (11.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and South African (11.7%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Immigrants \| Poland	92.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 11.6%
Creek	92.7 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.6 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	92.6 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 11.6%
Romanians	92.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Japan	91.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	91.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.6%
Syrians	91.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.6%
Jordanians	90.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	90.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	90.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.6%
Chickasaw	90.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.6%
Russians	89.9 /100 \| #106	Excellent 11.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	89.4 /100 \| #107	Excellent 11.7%
Turks	89.4 /100 \| #108	Excellent 11.7%
South Africans	89.3 /100 \| #109	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	88.7 /100 \| #110	Excellent 11.7%
Burmese	88.7 /100 \| #111	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	88.4 /100 \| #112	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	87.0 /100 \| #113	Excellent 11.7%