Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Burmese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Burmese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Burmese
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Burmese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,452,968 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 37.7% |
| Range | 28.3% | 36.2% |
| Mean | 10.4% | 9.3% |
| Median | 9.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Burmese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Turkish (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.9%, a difference of 0.73%), Korean (10.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |