Immigrants from Singapore vs Burmese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Singapore
Burmese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Singapore
Burmese
10.9%
POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Singapore vs Burmese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,414,586 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.279 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,896,901 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Singapore | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 21.5% | 37.7% |
| Range | 21.0% | 36.2% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 9.3% |
| Median | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Singapore and Burmese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Korean (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Iran (10.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |