Immigrants from Cuba vs Bangladeshi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Bangladeshi
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Bangladeshis
17.9%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Bangladeshi Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,352,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,940,566 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 60.1%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 3.5% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 41.8% | 37.5% |
Range | 38.3% | 36.7% |
Mean | 18.9% | 12.7% |
Median | 17.9% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 6.8% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Dominican (17.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Hopi (17.8%, a difference of 0.87%), Lumbee (18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (18.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and Navajo (17.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.9% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 16.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 17.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 17.5% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 19.8% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Albanian (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Vietnam (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Chilean (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Taiwanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (11.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Laos | 35.7 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 34.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 32.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 30.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.1% |
Taiwanese | 29.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.2% |
Chileans | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 26.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.2% |
Bangladeshis | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.2% |
Albanians | 24.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 21.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
Costa Ricans | 17.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 16.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.3% |