Immigrants from Croatia vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Zimbabwean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Zimbabweans
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Zimbabwean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,552,240 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,180,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.43% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 18.8% |
Range | 17.1% | 17.7% |
Mean | 8.6% | 8.1% |
Median | 8.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Zimbabweans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Asian (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Japan (10.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swiss (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |