Immigrants from Australia vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,602,461 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,361,741 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 8.9%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Bhutanese
Minimum	4.9%	1.9%
Maximum	100.0%	45.2%
Range	95.1%	43.3%
Mean	21.5%	11.4%
Median	13.6%	9.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.0%	6.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	21.2%	14.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.2%	8.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	21.9%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.7%	7.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Luxembourger (13.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Scotland (13.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Tongans	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.4%
Asians	99.6 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.5%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.5%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.6%
Luxembourgers	99.5 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.5 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 13.7%
Croatians	99.4 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.3 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 13.8%
Greeks	99.3 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 13.8%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.2 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 13.8%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Burmese (12.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 11.6%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 12.1%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 12.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| Iran	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 12.4%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.9 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 12.5%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 12.5%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 12.7%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 13.0%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 13.0%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 13.0%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.0%