Houma vs Celtic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Houma
Celtic
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Houma
Celtics
14.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Celtic Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,747,391 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,620,059 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 49.8%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Celtic |
| Minimum | 9.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 34.3% | 26.0% |
| Range | 24.5% | 24.1% |
| Mean | 16.1% | 10.3% |
| Median | 14.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Houma by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Immigrants from Haiti (14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Barbados (14.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Cape Verdean (14.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Yakama (14.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Honduras (14.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Canada (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Serbian (9.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (9.8%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Slavs | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Afghans | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Serbians | 99.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Celtics | 99.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 98.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| French Canadians | 98.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Macedonians | 98.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 98.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |