Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Nepal Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,212,550 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,282,037 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from Nepal
Minimum	5.7%	2.1%
Maximum	60.0%	42.0%
Range	54.3%	39.9%
Mean	15.8%	12.9%
Median	10.8%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.4%	8.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.3%	13.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.7%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.4%	7.3%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Nepal by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Jordanian (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Chickasaw (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Immigrants from Uganda (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Icelander (11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Jordanians	90.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	90.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	90.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.6%
Chickasaw	90.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.6%
Russians	89.9 /100 \| #106	Excellent 11.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	89.4 /100 \| #107	Excellent 11.7%
Turks	89.4 /100 \| #108	Excellent 11.7%
South Africans	89.3 /100 \| #109	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	88.7 /100 \| #110	Excellent 11.7%
Burmese	88.7 /100 \| #111	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	88.4 /100 \| #112	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	87.0 /100 \| #113	Excellent 11.7%
Ukrainians	86.9 /100 \| #114	Excellent 11.7%
New Zealanders	86.3 /100 \| #115	Excellent 11.7%
Iraqis	86.3 /100 \| #116	Excellent 11.7%
Icelanders	85.7 /100 \| #117	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	85.5 /100 \| #118	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Uganda	84.8 /100 \| #119	Excellent 11.8%
Immigrants \| Nepal	84.5 /100 \| #120	Excellent 11.8%
Malaysians	84.1 /100 \| #121	Excellent 11.8%