German vs Swiss Male Poverty
COMPARE
German
Swiss
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Germans
Swiss
10.1%
MALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German vs Swiss Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,875,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Germans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,423,995 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 58.2% | 47.0% |
| Range | 57.2% | 45.9% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Germans and Swiss by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Austria (10.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Estonian (10.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (10.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Europe (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Slovak (10.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Netherlands (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Italy (10.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Asians | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Germans | 98.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Estonians | 98.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |