French Canadian vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
Immigrants from Turkey
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
French Canadians
Immigrants from Turkey
11.6%
POVERTY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,211,905 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,543 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.21%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French Canadian | Immigrants from Turkey |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 68.6% |
| Range | 30.9% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Immigrants from Turkey by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |