French American Indian vs Ghanaian Male Poverty
COMPARE
French American Indian
Ghanaian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
French American Indians
Ghanaians
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Ghanaian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,954,359 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,493,527 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.030%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 4.1% | 0.62% |
Maximum | 36.3% | 28.3% |
Range | 32.2% | 27.6% |
Mean | 13.8% | 11.1% |
Median | 12.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to French American Indians and Ghanaians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Armenia (12.6%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Ecuadorian (12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (12.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (12.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Laos (12.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.6 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.6% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.7% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |