Czech vs Danish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Danish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Danes
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Danish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,224,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,673,857 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Danish |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 31.4% | 50.0% |
| Range | 29.9% | 48.6% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 13.5% |
| Median | 10.6% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Danes by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Cypriot (11.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |