Cuban vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Spanish American Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Spanish American Indians
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Spanish American Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,136,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 0.050%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 5.8% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 31.2% | 48.9% |
Range | 25.5% | 41.2% |
Mean | 15.8% | 16.8% |
Median | 14.6% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Spanish American Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #236 | Tragic 15.1% |
French American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.6 /100 | #238 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |