Cree vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Cree
Latvian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Cree
Latvians
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,883,921 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 37.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cree | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.2% | 98.8% |
Mean | 24.0% | 20.0% |
Median | 19.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 20.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 20.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cree by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |