Cambodian vs Carpatho Rusyn Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cambodian
Carpatho Rusyn
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cambodians
Carpatho Rusyns
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Carpatho Rusyn Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,481,907 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,861,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.030%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cambodian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 30.2% |
Range | 34.9% | 29.7% |
Mean | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Median | 10.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Carpatho Rusyns by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.030%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and European (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |