Burmese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 402,925,869 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 7.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 48.4% |
| Range | 50.5% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 16.1% |
| Median | 11.0% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 11.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Romania (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Brazilian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Cypriot (11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Peruvian (11.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Samoans | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Burmese | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Cuban (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |