British vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
British
Brazilian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
British
Brazilians
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
96.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Brazilian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 515,985,739 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,230,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 5.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Brazilian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.6% |
Range | 95.3% | 39.6% |
Mean | 38.9% | 16.2% |
Median | 22.1% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.9% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 62.0% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.7% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to British by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to British are Immigrants from Egypt (14.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (14.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from France (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Finnish (14.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Chilean (15.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Paraguayans | 96.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Argentineans | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Finns | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 96.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
British | 96.2 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | France | 96.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Chileans | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Slovak (15.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Venezuelan (15.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Puget Sound Salish (15.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (15.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Venezuelans | 82.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Brazilians | 81.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.8% |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |