Bolivian vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Bolivian
Cherokee
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Bolivians
Cherokee
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,125,040 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,649,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 50.5%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.24% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 61.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.0% | 93.1% |
Mean | 11.8% | 26.3% |
Median | 10.2% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Turkish (11.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Bhutanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (17.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 0.48%), African (17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and Chickasaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |