Swiss vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Swiss
Cherokee
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Swiss
Cherokee
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
61.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Cherokee Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,860,675 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,649,449 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 28.2%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Cherokee |
Minimum | 5.4% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 44.6% | 93.1% |
Mean | 17.7% | 26.3% |
Median | 13.9% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.0% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are British (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Ugandan (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Basque (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Belgian (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 70.3 /100 | #157 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 69.2 /100 | #158 | Good 13.3% |
Uruguayans | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | South America | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Icelanders | 65.7 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Ugandans | 64.1 /100 | #162 | Good 13.4% |
British | 63.5 /100 | #163 | Good 13.4% |
Swiss | 61.7 /100 | #164 | Good 13.4% |
Basques | 59.3 /100 | #165 | Average 13.4% |
Belgians | 58.9 /100 | #166 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 58.6 /100 | #167 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 57.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Samoans | 56.8 /100 | #169 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 53.0 /100 | #170 | Average 13.5% |
South American Indians | 51.9 /100 | #171 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (17.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 0.48%), African (17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), Yaqui (17.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and Chickasaw (17.0%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |