Bolivian vs Bulgarian Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Bulgarian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Bulgarians
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Bulgarian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,629,688 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,564,290 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 0.58% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 53.2% |
Range | 32.4% | 52.7% |
Mean | 9.4% | 8.2% |
Median | 8.5% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Bulgarians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.99%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |