Bolivian vs Italian Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Italian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Italians
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Italian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,629,688 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,117,445 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bolivian | Italian |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 63.0% |
| Range | 32.4% | 60.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 9.9% |
| Median | 8.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bolivians and Italians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and Norwegian (10.5%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |