Bhutanese vs Bulgarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Bulgarian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Bhutanese
Bulgarians
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Bulgarian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,130,109 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,366,054 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 0.90%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Bulgarian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 18.1% |
| Range | 73.9% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 7.0% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Bulgarians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Italian (9.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Irish (9.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |