Basque vs Immigrants from Denmark Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,410,645 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,139,155 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Basque	Immigrants from Denmark
Minimum	1.8%	4.6%
Maximum	54.1%	100.0%
Range	52.2%	95.4%
Mean	18.3%	29.2%
Median	13.6%	15.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.9%	10.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.9%	24.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.7%	29.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.6%	29.1%

Demographics Similar to Basques and Immigrants from Denmark by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Immigrants from North Macedonia (15.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.1 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 14.9%
Basques	95.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Egypt	95.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 15.0%
Paraguayans	95.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 15.0%
British	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 15.0%
Romanians	95.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| England	95.1 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 15.1%
Chileans	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	95.0 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Brazil	94.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 15.1%
Serbians	94.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Croatia	94.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	94.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	94.3 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 15.1%
Dutch	94.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 15.1%
Sri Lankans	94.0 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.3 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%