Armenian vs Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Tlingit-Haida
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Tlingit-Haida
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Tlingit-Haida Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,692,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,564 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 20.1% | 28.9% |
| Range | 16.9% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.7% |
| Median | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Tlingit-Haida by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |