American vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
COMPARE
American
Immigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Americans
Immigrants from the Azores
13.4%
POVERTY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,977,330 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,256,915 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 0.85% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 80.3% | 24.6% |
Range | 79.4% | 22.8% |
Mean | 20.5% | 11.0% |
Median | 17.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Immigrants from the Azores by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Cambodia (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian (13.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Thailand (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 3.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 13.4% |
Americans | 2.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alsatians | 2.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.4% |
German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.4% |