Alaska Native vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Alaska Natives
Marshallese
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,522,237 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 23.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 0.010%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Marshallese |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.5% |
| Range | 91.7% | 40.3% |
| Mean | 32.1% | 28.7% |
| Median | 24.2% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.4% | 34.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.6% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives and Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.95%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |