Yup'ik vs Cheyenne In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Yup'ik
 Cheyenne
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Yup'ik
Cheyenne
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Cheyenne In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,956,456 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 77.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,703,463 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 79.5%, a difference of 2.9%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Cheyenne | 
| Minimum | 28.6% | 51.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 71.4% | 48.3% | 
| Mean | 79.8% | 77.6% | 
| Median | 82.0% | 78.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.8% | 68.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.4% | 83.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 15.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 13.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 12.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Cheyenne by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pueblo (77.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (77.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Hopi (77.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Apache (77.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Arapaho (78.1%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 78.9%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 78.1%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 77.9%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 77.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 77.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 77.0%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 76.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 76.3%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 74.8%  |