Ugandan vs Immigrants from Australia In Labor Force | Age 30-34

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,994,980 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 85.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,147,173 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 0.21%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ugandan	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	69.3%	53.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	30.7%	46.1%
Mean	89.1%	88.3%
Median	87.9%	87.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	85.0%	84.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	95.1%	98.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	14.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.8%	9.7%

Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Australia by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (85.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (85.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Albanian (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Norwegian (85.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Greece (85.7%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Sweden (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Lithuanian (85.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Cape Verdean (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Morocco (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Croatian (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	99.9 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 85.8%
Ugandans	99.9 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 85.8%
Serbians	99.9 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 85.8%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 85.7%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 85.7%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 85.7%
Eastern Europeans	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 85.7%
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 85.7%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 85.7%
Zimbabweans	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Morocco	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 85.6%
Croatians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 85.6%
Lithuanians	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.8 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 85.6%
Cape Verdeans	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 85.6%