Sri Lankan vs Korean In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Korean
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Koreans
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
23.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Korean In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,177,214 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,404,908 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 84.5%, a difference of 0.56%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Korean |
| Minimum | 61.0% | 62.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.0% | 37.4% |
| Mean | 85.0% | 85.4% |
| Median | 85.0% | 84.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.2% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.6% | 87.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |
| Palestinians | 77.7 /100 | #145 | Good 84.9% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Afghanistan (84.5%, a difference of 0.0%), British (84.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (84.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Syria (84.5%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Taiwanese | 29.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 84.6% |
| Nigerians | 28.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 84.5% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 25.8 /100 | #190 | Fair 84.5% |
| Hungarians | 24.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 84.5% |
| Scandinavians | 24.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 84.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 23.9 /100 | #193 | Fair 84.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 23.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 84.5% |
| Koreans | 23.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 84.5% |
| British | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 84.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 21.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 84.5% |
| Dutch | 20.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 84.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 19.1 /100 | #199 | Poor 84.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 19.0 /100 | #200 | Poor 84.5% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 18.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 84.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 18.1 /100 | #202 | Poor 84.5% |