Slavic vs South African In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Slavic
South African
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Slavs
South Africans
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
93.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
88.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs South African In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,808,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,558,179 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | South African |
| Minimum | 37.3% | 74.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.7% | 25.1% |
| Mean | 85.9% | 89.2% |
| Median | 88.4% | 86.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.3% | 84.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 97.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and South Africans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Egyptian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Chilean (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belarus (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Finnish (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Mongolians | 94.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 94.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 93.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Egyptians | 93.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slavs | 93.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 93.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 93.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 92.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 88.8 /100 | #116 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Finns | 87.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 85.0% |