Pima vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Pima
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Pima
Lithuanians
72.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
83.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,114 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.543 and weighted average of 72.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,730,198 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 83.6%, a difference of 14.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 25.0% | 45.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.0% | 54.6% |
| Mean | 66.6% | 82.9% |
| Median | 73.9% | 84.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 53.6% | 77.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.2% | 90.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.5% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.6% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Navajo (72.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Houma (74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (74.4%, a difference of 2.2%), Hopi (75.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and Tohono O'odham (75.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 76.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 76.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 76.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 75.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 75.1% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 75.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 72.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 72.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Burmese (83.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (83.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (83.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (83.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Morocco (83.6%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 83.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 83.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 83.7% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 83.7% |
| Venezuelans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Burmese | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.1 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.1 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Croatians | 99.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 98.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Poles | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 83.6% |
| Peruvians | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 83.6% |