Immigrants from Somalia vs Liberian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,101,843 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 85.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,044,655 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 0.020%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Somalia	Liberian
Minimum	70.6%	73.0%
Maximum	100.0%	99.7%
Range	29.4%	26.7%
Mean	86.0%	86.8%
Median	85.9%	86.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.8%	83.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	88.2%	91.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.4%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.9%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.8%	5.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia and Liberians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Norwegian (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ireland (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (85.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Carpatho Rusyn (85.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 86.2%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 86.2%
Zimbabweans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 86.1%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 86.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.4%