Immigrants from Guatemala vs Spanish American Indian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,183,451 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,144,470 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 82.5%, a difference of 0.58%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Guatemala	Spanish American Indian
Minimum	41.7%	66.7%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	58.3%	33.3%
Mean	80.1%	81.5%
Median	82.5%	81.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	78.2%	78.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	85.5%	84.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.5%	6.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.5%	6.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Spanish American Indians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Osage (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Central American Indian (82.5%, a difference of 0.020%), American (82.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tlingit-Haida (82.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Ottawa (82.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Mexican American Indian (82.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Osage	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 82.9%
Fijians	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 82.9%
Puget Sound Salish	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 82.9%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 82.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 82.9%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 82.8%
Spanish Americans	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 82.8%
Potawatomi	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 82.7%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 82.7%
Mexican American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 82.6%
Hmong	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 82.6%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 82.6%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 82.5%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 82.5%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 82.5%
Americans	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 82.4%