Immigrants from Africa vs Tongan In Labor Force | Age 20-64

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,448,483 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 80.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,905,644 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.369 and weighted average of 80.3%, a difference of 0.20%.

In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Africa	Tongan
Minimum	52.7%	65.4%
Maximum	100.0%	87.5%
Range	47.3%	22.1%
Mean	81.7%	79.3%
Median	81.4%	80.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	79.4%	76.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	83.9%	81.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.6%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.9%	4.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.9%	4.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Tongans by In Labor Force | Age 20-64

In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Hong Kong (80.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Slovene (80.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (80.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (80.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (80.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Swedish (80.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Burmese (80.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (80.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (80.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Korea (80.3%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 20-64
Czechs	99.7 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 80.5%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	99.7 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 80.5%
Slovenes	99.7 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 80.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.6 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 80.5%
Immigrants \| Africa	99.6 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 80.4%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	99.5 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 80.4%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.4 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 80.4%
Immigrants \| Sudan	99.4 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 80.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 80.4%
Turks	99.2 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 80.3%
Immigrants \| Peru	99.2 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 80.3%
Peruvians	99.1 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 80.3%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	99.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 80.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	99.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 80.3%
Afghans	98.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 80.3%
Serbians	98.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 80.3%
Swedes	98.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 80.3%
Tongans	98.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 80.3%
Burmese	98.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 80.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	98.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 80.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	98.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 80.3%